Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Appcues vs Doctolib
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Appcues and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Appcues (rank #257) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 33). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Appcues is ahead of Doctolib. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Appcues. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Appcues is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Appcues is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Appcues is ahead of Doctolib.
Appcues carries 984 GitHub stars across 122 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Appcues is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Doctolib looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Appcues | Doctolib |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 33 |
| Code | 63 | 51 |
| Education | 70 | 72 |
| Community | 29 | 28 |
| Reach | 18 | 10 |
| Momentum | 31 | 19 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 984 | 776 |
| Forks | 141 | 81 |
| Public repos | 122 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 10 |
| External contributors | 6 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 31 |