Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉
Appcues vs ReadMe
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Appcues and ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Appcues and ReadMe sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (47), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of Appcues. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is ahead of Appcues. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is ahead of Appcues. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Appcues. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is ahead of Appcues.
Appcues carries 984 GitHub stars across 122 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. ReadMe shows 1,824 stars across 106 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.
Appcues is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. ReadMe looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Appcues | ReadMe |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #257 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 47 |
| Code | 63 | 76 |
| Education | 70 | 79 |
| Community | 29 | 43 |
| Reach | 18 | 26 |
| Momentum | 31 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 984 | 1,824 |
| Forks | 141 | 451 |
| Public repos | 122 | 106 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 26 |
| External contributors | 6 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 74 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 48 |