World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Appcues vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Appcues and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Appcues (rank #257) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 47). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Appcues is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Appcues is ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Appcues. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Appcues. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Appcues is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Appcues carries 984 GitHub stars across 122 public repos, with 17 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Appcues is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Appcues | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #257 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 47 | 48 |
| Code | 63 | 58 |
| Education | 70 | 59 |
| Community | 29 | 37 |
| Reach | 18 | 47 |
| Momentum | 31 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 984 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 141 | 384 |
| Public repos | 122 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 17 | 14 |
| External contributors | 6 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 38 |