Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.
Asana vs ForestAdmin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Asana and ForestAdmin (Forest Admin provides an off-the-shelf admin panel based on a highly-extensible API plugged into your application.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ForestAdmin (rank #165) holds a narrow lead over Asana (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 43). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ForestAdmin is ahead of Asana. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ForestAdmin is slightly ahead of Asana. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Asana is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Asana is slightly ahead of ForestAdmin. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ForestAdmin is ahead of Asana.
Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. ForestAdmin shows 3,415 stars across 87 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 9 external contributors.
Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. ForestAdmin looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Asana | ForestAdmin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #165 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 51 |
| Code | 49 | 66 |
| Education | 70 | 74 |
| Community | 29 | 28 |
| Reach | 38 | 35 |
| Momentum | 16 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,843 | 3,415 |
| Forks | 598 | 360 |
| Public repos | 34 | 87 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 14 |
| External contributors | 2 | 9 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 64 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 33 |