Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Asana vs Quo

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Asana and Quo (World's best business phone app) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Asana (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Quo (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Asana is ahead of Quo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is clearly ahead of Quo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Asana is ahead of Quo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Quo is slightly ahead of Asana. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Quo is clearly ahead of Asana.

Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Quo shows 12 stars across 20 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Asana's footprint is roughly 153.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Quo looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAsanaQuo
Ranking
Overall rank#338#625
Pillars
Overall4333
Code4932
Education7043
Community2911
Reach3844
Momentum1641
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,84312
Forks5981
Public repos3420
Active repos (90d)82
External contributors20
Avg polish4428
Avg AI-readiness4339

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Asana developer profileView Quo developer profile