Asana vs pCloud Open Source
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Asana and pCloud Open Source both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Asana (rank #338) holds a modest lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 32). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Asana is ahead of pCloud Open Source. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Asana is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is ahead of Asana. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Asana is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source.
Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. pCloud Open Source shows 867 stars across 16 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. pCloud Open Source looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Asana | pCloud Open Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 32 |
| Code | 49 | 39 |
| Education | 70 | 64 |
| Community | 29 | 27 |
| Reach | 38 | 55 |
| Momentum | 16 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,843 | 867 |
| Forks | 598 | 285 |
| Public repos | 34 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 4 |
| External contributors | 2 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 37 |