Asana vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Asana and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Asana (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of Asana. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Recurly is slightly ahead of Asana. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Asana is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Asana.
Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Asana | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 44 |
| Code | 49 | 68 |
| Education | 70 | 57 |
| Community | 29 | 34 |
| Reach | 38 | 7 |
| Momentum | 16 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,843 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 598 | 700 |
| Public repos | 34 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 26 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 37 |