Asana vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Asana and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Asana (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 42). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Asana. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Asana. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Asana is ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Asana.
Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Asana | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 42 |
| Code | 49 | 59 |
| Education | 70 | 52 |
| Community | 29 | 42 |
| Reach | 38 | 23 |
| Momentum | 16 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,843 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 598 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 34 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 31 |
| External contributors | 2 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 48 |