Asana vs Thomson Reuters

Asana and Thomson Reuters both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Asana (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Thomson Reuters (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Asana is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Asana is slightly ahead of Thomson Reuters. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Thomson Reuters is slightly ahead of Asana.

Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Thomson Reuters shows 436 stars across 143 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Asana's footprint is roughly 4.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Thomson Reuters looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.