Asana vs Workable
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Asana and Workable both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Asana (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Workable (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Workable is slightly ahead of Asana. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is ahead of Workable. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Asana is slightly ahead of Workable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Workable is slightly ahead of Asana. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Workable is ahead of Asana.
Asana carries 1,843 GitHub stars across 34 public repos, with 8 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Workable shows 785 stars across 96 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Asana is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Workable looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Asana | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 35 |
| Code | 49 | 51 |
| Education | 70 | 56 |
| Community | 29 | 24 |
| Reach | 38 | 41 |
| Momentum | 16 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,843 | 785 |
| Forks | 598 | 135 |
| Public repos | 34 | 96 |
| Active repos (90d) | 8 | 5 |
| External contributors | 2 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 49 |