Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Ashby vs Fillout

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Ashby and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over Ashby (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 36). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ashby is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ashby is ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of Ashby. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Ashby.

Ashby carries 1 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.

Ashby is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAshbyFillout
Ranking
Overall rank#536#510
Pillars
Overall3637
Code3634
Education6253
Community1427
Reach3750
Momentum1515
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars12
Forks14
Public repos39
Active repos (90d)13
External contributors23
Avg polish2334
Avg AI-readiness3721

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Ashby developer profileView Fillout developer profile