Ashby vs mParticle by Rokt
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ashby and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Ashby (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 36). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Ashby. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Ashby. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is clearly ahead of Ashby. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ashby is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of Ashby.
Ashby carries 1 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but mParticle by Rokt's footprint is roughly 317.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ashby is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. mParticle by Rokt looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ashby | mParticle by Rokt |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 43 |
| Code | 36 | 59 |
| Education | 62 | 63 |
| Community | 14 | 38 |
| Reach | 37 | 28 |
| Momentum | 15 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1 | 317 |
| Forks | 1 | 521 |
| Public repos | 3 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 14 |
| External contributors | 2 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 50 |