Ashby vs Swiggy
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ashby and Swiggy (Swiggy Public Repos) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ashby (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Swiggy (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ashby is slightly ahead of Swiggy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Swiggy is ahead of Ashby. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ashby is ahead of Swiggy. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Swiggy is ahead of Ashby.
Ashby carries 1 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Swiggy shows 314 stars across 22 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Swiggy's footprint is roughly 314.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ashby is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Swiggy looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ashby | Swiggy |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 32 |
| Code | 36 | 36 |
| Education | 62 | 55 |
| Community | 14 | 30 |
| Reach | 37 | 18 |
| Momentum | 15 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1 | 314 |
| Forks | 1 | 93 |
| Public repos | 3 | 22 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 3 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 37 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 32 |