Ashby vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ashby and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Ashby (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 36). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Ashby. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is slightly ahead of Ashby. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Ashby. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Ashby.
Ashby carries 1 GitHub stars across 3 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Zscaler, Inc.'s footprint is roughly 337.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ashby is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ashby | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 45 |
| Code | 36 | 76 |
| Education | 62 | 65 |
| Community | 14 | 39 |
| Reach | 37 | 37 |
| Momentum | 15 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1 | 337 |
| Forks | 1 | 199 |
| Public repos | 3 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 33 |
| External contributors | 2 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 61 |