Data and AI: Unlocking new science insights
AstraZeneca vs Qodo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AstraZeneca (Data and AI: Unlocking new science insights) and Qodo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qodo (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over AstraZeneca (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 37). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AstraZeneca is clearly ahead of Qodo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), AstraZeneca is slightly ahead of Qodo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qodo is ahead of AstraZeneca. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qodo is clearly ahead of AstraZeneca. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AstraZeneca is slightly ahead of Qodo.
AstraZeneca carries 5,180 GitHub stars across 107 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Qodo shows 4,512 stars across 23 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
AstraZeneca is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Qodo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AstraZeneca | Qodo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 41 |
| Code | 57 | 31 |
| Education | 75 | 71 |
| Community | 25 | 39 |
| Reach | 22 | 47 |
| Momentum | 34 | 32 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,180 | 4,512 |
| Forks | 605 | 407 |
| Public repos | 107 | 23 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 2 |
| External contributors | 2 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 28 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 28 |