Data and AI: Unlocking new science insights
AstraZeneca vs Mage
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AstraZeneca (Data and AI: Unlocking new science insights) and Mage (Magical tools for data.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Mage (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over AstraZeneca (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 37). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AstraZeneca is clearly ahead of Mage. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), AstraZeneca is slightly ahead of Mage. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mage is ahead of AstraZeneca. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mage is ahead of AstraZeneca. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AstraZeneca is ahead of Mage.
AstraZeneca carries 5,180 GitHub stars across 107 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Mage shows 9,079 stars across 44 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
AstraZeneca is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Mage looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AstraZeneca | Mage |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 38 |
| Code | 57 | 34 |
| Education | 75 | 71 |
| Community | 25 | 38 |
| Reach | 22 | 40 |
| Momentum | 34 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 5,180 | 9,079 |
| Forks | 605 | 1,538 |
| Public repos | 107 | 44 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 8 |
| External contributors | 2 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 65 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 15 |