Attio vs celigo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Attio and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Attio (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 35). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), celigo is ahead of Attio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Attio. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of Attio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Attio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Attio is clearly ahead of celigo.
Attio carries 90 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 13 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Attio is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. celigo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Attio | celigo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 36 |
| Code | 30 | 39 |
| Education | 56 | 57 |
| Community | 16 | 29 |
| Reach | 18 | 52 |
| Momentum | 34 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 90 | 43 |
| Forks | 15 | 131 |
| Public repos | 19 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 13 | 6 |
| External contributors | 1 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 27 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 30 |