Attio vs Doist
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Attio and Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Attio (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 35). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is clearly ahead of Attio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is clearly ahead of Attio. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of Attio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doist is clearly ahead of Attio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is ahead of Attio.
Attio carries 90 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 13 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Doist shows 5,576 stars across 170 public repos, 45 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 62.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Attio is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Doist looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Attio | Doist |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 54 |
| Code | 30 | 59 |
| Education | 56 | 85 |
| Community | 16 | 36 |
| Reach | 18 | 40 |
| Momentum | 34 | 46 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 90 | 5,576 |
| Forks | 15 | 563 |
| Public repos | 19 | 170 |
| Active repos (90d) | 13 | 45 |
| External contributors | 1 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 27 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 47 |