Attio vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Attio and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Attio and UXPin sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (35), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Attio. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Attio is slightly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of Attio.
Attio carries 90 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 13 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but UXPin's footprint is roughly 9.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Attio is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Attio | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 35 |
| Code | 30 | 30 |
| Education | 56 | 66 |
| Community | 16 | 13 |
| Reach | 18 | 39 |
| Momentum | 34 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 90 | 879 |
| Forks | 15 | 117 |
| Public repos | 19 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 13 | 3 |
| External contributors | 1 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 27 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 23 | 21 |