AWeber vs celigo

AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

AWeber and celigo sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AWeber is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), AWeber is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of AWeber. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of AWeber. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AWeber is ahead of celigo.

AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but AWeber's footprint is roughly 11.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AWeber is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. celigo looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.