AWeber vs Cloudbeds

AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

AWeber (rank #538) holds a narrow lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AWeber is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of AWeber. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is ahead of AWeber. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), AWeber is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), AWeber is ahead of Cloudbeds.

AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but AWeber's footprint is roughly 10.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AWeber is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cloudbeds looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.