Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.
AWeber vs Cybersource
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and Cybersource both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
AWeber and Cybersource sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cybersource is slightly ahead of AWeber. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), AWeber is slightly ahead of Cybersource. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cybersource is ahead of AWeber. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is clearly ahead of AWeber. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cybersource is ahead of AWeber.
AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Cybersource shows 587 stars across 40 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.
AWeber is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Cybersource looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AWeber | Cybersource |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 36 |
| Code | 47 | 49 |
| Education | 68 | 64 |
| Community | 19 | 31 |
| Reach | 8 | 36 |
| Momentum | 28 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 503 | 587 |
| Forks | 225 | 986 |
| Public repos | 22 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 28 |
| External contributors | 0 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 43 |