AWeber vs Gravity Forms

AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

AWeber (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), AWeber is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is ahead of AWeber. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), AWeber is slightly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of AWeber. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is ahead of AWeber.

AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Gravity Forms shows 112 stars across 8 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but AWeber's footprint is roughly 4.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AWeber is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Gravity Forms looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.