Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.
Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/
AWeber vs LiveChat
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and LiveChat (Join LiveChat Developer Program https://platform.text.com/) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
LiveChat (rank #141) holds a modest lead over AWeber (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (53 vs 36). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), LiveChat is slightly ahead of AWeber. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), LiveChat is ahead of AWeber. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), LiveChat is ahead of AWeber. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), LiveChat is clearly ahead of AWeber. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), LiveChat is slightly ahead of AWeber.
AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. LiveChat shows 755 stars across 168 public repos, 24 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
AWeber is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. LiveChat looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | AWeber | LiveChat |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #141 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 53 |
| Code | 47 | 54 |
| Education | 68 | 80 |
| Community | 19 | 36 |
| Reach | 8 | 50 |
| Momentum | 28 | 35 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 503 | 755 |
| Forks | 225 | 335 |
| Public repos | 22 | 168 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 24 |
| External contributors | 0 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 45 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 37 |