AWeber vs Skyscanner

AWeber (Powerfully-simple #emailmarketing for small businesses.) and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a modest lead over AWeber (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 36). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is ahead of AWeber. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of AWeber. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of AWeber. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of AWeber. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Skyscanner is ahead of AWeber.

AWeber carries 503 GitHub stars across 22 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 16.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

AWeber is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Skyscanner looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.