Baremetrics vs Fillout

Baremetrics (Subscription Analytics & Insights. One click and you get hundreds of valuable metrics & business insights from Stripe, Recurly, Braintree and more!) and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Baremetrics and Fillout sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (37), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Baremetrics is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Baremetrics is clearly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is ahead of Baremetrics. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Baremetrics. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is slightly ahead of Baremetrics.

Baremetrics carries 908 GitHub stars across 15 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Baremetrics's footprint is roughly 454.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Baremetrics is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.