37signals vs Gusto

37signals (HEY! It's in Basecamp!) and Gusto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

37signals (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Gusto (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 43). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Gusto is slightly ahead of 37signals. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gusto is ahead of 37signals. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), 37signals is ahead of Gusto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 37signals is clearly ahead of Gusto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), 37signals is ahead of Gusto.

37signals carries 113,857 GitHub stars across 236 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 298 external contributors on record. Gusto shows 781 stars across 148 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 37signals's footprint is roughly 145.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

37signals is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Gusto looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.