37signals vs Miro

37signals (HEY! It's in Basecamp!) and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

37signals (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 38). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of 37signals. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), 37signals is clearly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 37signals is clearly ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), 37signals is clearly ahead of Miro.

37signals carries 113,857 GitHub stars across 236 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 298 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 37signals's footprint is roughly 135.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

37signals is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.