37signals vs mParticle by Rokt

37signals (HEY! It's in Basecamp!) and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

37signals (rank #122) holds a modest lead over mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 43). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of 37signals. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of 37signals. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), 37signals is ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 37signals is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), 37signals is ahead of mParticle by Rokt.

37signals carries 113,857 GitHub stars across 236 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 298 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 37signals's footprint is roughly 359.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

37signals is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. mParticle by Rokt looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.