37signals vs Webflow

37signals (HEY! It's in Basecamp!) and Webflow (Webflow is the way to design, build, and launch powerful websites visually - without coding.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

37signals and Webflow sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (54), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), 37signals is ahead of Webflow. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Webflow is clearly ahead of 37signals. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), 37signals is clearly ahead of Webflow. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 37signals is slightly ahead of Webflow.

37signals carries 113,857 GitHub stars across 236 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 298 external contributors on record. Webflow shows 735 stars across 52 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 37signals's footprint is roughly 154.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

37signals is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Webflow looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.