37signals vs Wrike

37signals (HEY! It's in Basecamp!) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

37signals (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 34). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), 37signals is ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of 37signals. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), 37signals is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), 37signals is clearly ahead of Wrike. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), 37signals is ahead of Wrike.

37signals carries 113,857 GitHub stars across 236 public repos, with 48 repositories active in the last 90 days and 298 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but 37signals's footprint is roughly 412.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

37signals is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.