Next-gen newsletter platform on a mission to help creators and businesses seamlessly create, monetize, and grow their audiences.
beehiiv vs celigo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
beehiiv (Next-gen newsletter platform on a mission to help creators and businesses seamlessly create, monetize, and grow their audiences.) and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
beehiiv (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 36). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), beehiiv is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), beehiiv is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of beehiiv. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is slightly ahead of beehiiv. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), beehiiv is slightly ahead of celigo.
beehiiv carries 33 GitHub stars across 13 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
beehiiv is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. celigo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | beehiiv | celigo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #510 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 37 | 36 |
| Code | 40 | 39 |
| Education | 70 | 57 |
| Community | 14 | 29 |
| Reach | 46 | 52 |
| Momentum | 15 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 33 | 43 |
| Forks | 6 | 131 |
| Public repos | 13 | 26 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 6 |
| External contributors | 3 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 30 |