BigCommerce vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
BigCommerce and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a narrow lead over BigCommerce (rank #103) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 55). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), BigCommerce is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), BigCommerce is ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), BigCommerce is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of BigCommerce. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is slightly ahead of BigCommerce.
BigCommerce carries 3,505 GitHub stars across 281 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 51 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors.
BigCommerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BigCommerce | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #103 | #30 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 55 | 63 |
| Code | 73 | 68 |
| Education | 69 | 53 |
| Community | 48 | 44 |
| Reach | 26 | 58 |
| Momentum | 64 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,505 | 3,811 |
| Forks | 3,972 | 1,932 |
| Public repos | 281 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 38 |
| External contributors | 51 | 32 |
| Avg polish | 73 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 42 | 49 |