Blackboard Inc. vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Blackboard Inc. and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Blackboard Inc. (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 34). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Blackboard Inc.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Blackboard Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Blackboard Inc.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Blackboard Inc. is clearly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), RingCentral, Inc. is clearly ahead of Blackboard Inc..
Blackboard Inc. carries 715 GitHub stars across 117 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Blackboard Inc. is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Blackboard Inc. | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #602 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 42 |
| Code | 37 | 59 |
| Education | 45 | 52 |
| Community | 27 | 42 |
| Reach | 48 | 23 |
| Momentum | 4 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 715 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 346 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 117 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 31 |
| External contributors | 2 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 48 |