Build with Bold
Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Bold Commerce vs Doctolib
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Bold Commerce (Build with Bold) and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Bold Commerce (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 33). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Bold Commerce. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Bold Commerce. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Bold Commerce is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doctolib is ahead of Bold Commerce.
Bold Commerce carries 717 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Bold Commerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Doctolib looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Doctolib |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #455 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 33 |
| Code | 51 | 51 |
| Education | 66 | 72 |
| Community | 27 | 28 |
| Reach | 40 | 10 |
| Momentum | 8 | 19 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 717 | 776 |
| Forks | 406 | 81 |
| Public repos | 29 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 10 |
| External contributors | 1 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 31 |