Build with Bold
Bold Commerce vs Doist
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Bold Commerce (Build with Bold) and Doist (Empowering people with simple yet powerful tools ✨) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Doist (rank #122) holds a modest lead over Bold Commerce (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (54 vs 39). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doist is slightly ahead of Bold Commerce. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doist is ahead of Bold Commerce. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doist is ahead of Bold Commerce. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Doist is clearly ahead of Bold Commerce.
Bold Commerce carries 717 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Doist shows 5,576 stars across 170 public repos, 45 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Doist's footprint is roughly 7.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Bold Commerce is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Doist looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Doist |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #455 | #122 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 54 |
| Code | 51 | 59 |
| Education | 66 | 85 |
| Community | 27 | 36 |
| Reach | 40 | 40 |
| Momentum | 8 | 46 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 717 | 5,576 |
| Forks | 406 | 563 |
| Public repos | 29 | 170 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 45 |
| External contributors | 1 | 21 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 47 |