Build with Bold
Bold Commerce vs Fillout
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Bold Commerce (Build with Bold) and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Bold Commerce (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 37). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Bold Commerce is ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Bold Commerce is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is ahead of Bold Commerce. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is slightly ahead of Bold Commerce.
Bold Commerce carries 717 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Bold Commerce's footprint is roughly 358.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Bold Commerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Fillout |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #455 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 37 |
| Code | 51 | 34 |
| Education | 66 | 53 |
| Community | 27 | 27 |
| Reach | 40 | 50 |
| Momentum | 8 | 15 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 717 | 2 |
| Forks | 406 | 4 |
| Public repos | 29 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 3 |
| External contributors | 1 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 21 |