Build with Bold
Bold Commerce vs Recurly
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Bold Commerce (Build with Bold) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Bold Commerce (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 39). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of Bold Commerce. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Bold Commerce is ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Recurly is slightly ahead of Bold Commerce. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Bold Commerce is clearly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Bold Commerce.
Bold Commerce carries 717 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Bold Commerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Recurly |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #455 | #317 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 44 |
| Code | 51 | 68 |
| Education | 66 | 57 |
| Community | 27 | 34 |
| Reach | 40 | 7 |
| Momentum | 8 | 64 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 717 | 1,564 |
| Forks | 406 | 700 |
| Public repos | 29 | 53 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 26 |
| External contributors | 1 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 37 |