Build with Bold
Bold Commerce vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Bold Commerce (Build with Bold) and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Bold Commerce (rank #455) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 39). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Bold Commerce. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Bold Commerce is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Bold Commerce. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Bold Commerce is slightly ahead of Zscaler, Inc.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Bold Commerce.
Bold Commerce carries 717 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Bold Commerce is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Bold Commerce | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #455 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 45 |
| Code | 51 | 76 |
| Education | 66 | 65 |
| Community | 27 | 39 |
| Reach | 40 | 37 |
| Momentum | 8 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 717 | 337 |
| Forks | 406 | 199 |
| Public repos | 29 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 33 |
| External contributors | 1 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 48 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 38 | 61 |