BookStackApp vs Doctolib

BookStackApp and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

BookStackApp (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of BookStackApp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of BookStackApp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), BookStackApp is ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

BookStackApp carries 19,167 GitHub stars across 6 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but BookStackApp's footprint is roughly 24.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

BookStackApp is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Doctolib looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.