BookStackApp vs Proton Mail
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
BookStackApp and Proton Mail both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
BookStackApp and Proton Mail sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (41), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Proton Mail is ahead of BookStackApp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Proton Mail. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Proton Mail is slightly ahead of BookStackApp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Proton Mail is slightly ahead of BookStackApp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), BookStackApp is ahead of Proton Mail.
BookStackApp carries 19,167 GitHub stars across 6 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Proton Mail shows 16,265 stars across 186 public repos, 19 active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors.
BookStackApp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Proton Mail looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | BookStackApp | Proton Mail |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 41 |
| Code | 45 | 64 |
| Education | 69 | 42 |
| Community | 40 | 46 |
| Reach | 37 | 44 |
| Momentum | 68 | 52 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 19,167 | 16,265 |
| Forks | 2,677 | 2,240 |
| Public repos | 6 | 186 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 19 |
| External contributors | 5 | 20 |
| Avg polish | 56 | 74 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 18 | 32 |