Box vs celigo

Box (Box, Inc.) and celigo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Box (rank #93) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 36). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Box is clearly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Box is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Box is clearly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Box is ahead of celigo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Box is ahead of celigo.

Box carries 14,074 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. celigo shows 43 stars across 26 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Box's footprint is roughly 327.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Box is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. celigo makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.