Box, Inc.
Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.
Box vs IFTTT
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Box (Box, Inc.) and IFTTT (Automations for business and home. 1,000+ of your favorite apps, services and devices. Save time and get more done.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Box (rank #93) holds a modest lead over IFTTT (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 40). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Box is clearly ahead of IFTTT. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), IFTTT is slightly ahead of Box. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Box is ahead of IFTTT. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Box is slightly ahead of IFTTT. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Box is clearly ahead of IFTTT.
Box carries 14,074 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. IFTTT shows 15,307 stars across 75 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Box is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. IFTTT looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Box | IFTTT |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 40 |
| Code | 68 | 46 |
| Education | 66 | 72 |
| Community | 51 | 31 |
| Reach | 62 | 56 |
| Momentum | 31 | 2 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 14,074 | 15,307 |
| Forks | 3,717 | 1,499 |
| Public repos | 84 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 1 |
| External contributors | 33 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 67 | 49 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 45 | 42 |