Box, Inc.
Box vs Jamf
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Box (Box, Inc.) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Box (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 40). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Box is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is slightly ahead of Box. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Box is ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Box is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Box.
Box carries 14,074 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Box is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Box | Jamf |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 40 |
| Code | 68 | 33 |
| Education | 66 | 68 |
| Community | 51 | 41 |
| Reach | 62 | 44 |
| Momentum | 31 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 14,074 | 7,946 |
| Forks | 3,717 | 1,547 |
| Public repos | 84 | 114 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 20 |
| External contributors | 33 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 67 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 45 | 21 |