Box, Inc.
Box vs Lansweeper NV
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Box (Box, Inc.) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Box (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 30). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Box is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Box is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Box is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Box is ahead of Lansweeper NV. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Box is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV.
Box carries 14,074 GitHub stars across 84 public repos, with 18 repositories active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Box is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Box | Lansweeper NV |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 30 |
| Code | 68 | 0 |
| Education | 66 | 60 |
| Community | 51 | 0 |
| Reach | 62 | 50 |
| Momentum | 31 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 14,074 | 0 |
| Forks | 3,717 | 0 |
| Public repos | 84 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 18 | 0 |
| External contributors | 33 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 67 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 45 | 0 |