Braze, Inc.
Braze vs HubSpot
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Braze (Braze, Inc.) and HubSpot both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
HubSpot (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Braze (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 41). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), HubSpot is ahead of Braze. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Braze is clearly ahead of HubSpot. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), HubSpot is slightly ahead of Braze. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), HubSpot is clearly ahead of Braze. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), HubSpot is ahead of Braze.
Braze carries 488 GitHub stars across 136 public repos, with 22 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. HubSpot shows 53,481 stars across 381 public repos, 35 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but HubSpot's footprint is roughly 109.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Braze is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. HubSpot looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Braze | HubSpot |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #93 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 56 |
| Code | 43 | 55 |
| Education | 82 | 52 |
| Community | 32 | 35 |
| Reach | 40 | 95 |
| Momentum | 34 | 54 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 488 | 53,481 |
| Forks | 400 | 6,864 |
| Public repos | 136 | 381 |
| Active repos (90d) | 22 | 35 |
| External contributors | 10 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 50 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 37 |