The official public code repository of Brightspace and D2L Corporation.
Brightspace vs Qonto
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Brightspace (The official public code repository of Brightspace and D2L Corporation.) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Brightspace (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is slightly ahead of Brightspace. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Brightspace is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Qonto is ahead of Brightspace. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Brightspace is clearly ahead of Qonto.
Brightspace carries 436 GitHub stars across 144 public repos, with 64 repositories active in the last 90 days and 8 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Brightspace is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Qonto looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Brightspace | Qonto |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #569 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 35 | 43 |
| Code | 53 | 57 |
| Education | 75 | 75 |
| Community | 30 | 25 |
| Reach | 7 | 24 |
| Momentum | 78 | 21 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 436 | 501 |
| Forks | 373 | 158 |
| Public repos | 144 | 75 |
| Active repos (90d) | 64 | 11 |
| External contributors | 8 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 54 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 36 |