Bringg vs Culture Amp

Bringg and Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Bringg (rank #455) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 31). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is ahead of Bringg. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Bringg is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Bringg is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is ahead of Bringg. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Bringg.

Bringg carries 143 GitHub stars across 80 public repos, with 12 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Culture Amp shows 1,202 stars across 179 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Culture Amp's footprint is roughly 8.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Bringg is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Culture Amp looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.