Canvas-LMS vs Fillout
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Canvas-LMS and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Fillout (rank #512) holds a narrow lead over Canvas-LMS (rank #726) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 30). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Canvas-LMS is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Canvas-LMS is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Fillout is clearly ahead of Canvas-LMS. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Canvas-LMS. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is ahead of Canvas-LMS.
Canvas-LMS carries 1 GitHub stars across 1 public repos, with 0 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Canvas-LMS is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Fillout looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Canvas-LMS | Fillout |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #726 | #512 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 30 | 37 |
| Code | 42 | 34 |
| Education | 60 | 53 |
| Community | 3 | 31 |
| Reach | 23 | 50 |
| Momentum | 0 | 10 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1 | 2 |
| Forks | 0 | 4 |
| Public repos | 1 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 0 | 2 |
| External contributors | 0 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 30 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 15 | 21 |