celigo vs Cloudbeds

celigo and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

celigo (rank #567) holds a narrow lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 30). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of celigo.

celigo carries 36 GitHub stars across 15 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.